Published since 1923
DOI: 10.33622/0869-7019
Russian Science Citation Index (RSCI) на платформе Web of Science


  • BUILDING STRUCTURES, BUILDINGS AND FACILITIES
  • Modern Translucent Enclosing Structures For Seismic Areas
  • UDC 691.618.54
    doi: 10.33622/0869-7019.2025.02.15-20
    Arkadiy V. GRANOVSKIY1, granovskiyav@mgsu.ru
    Sergey V. DEMISHIN2, sergevdm@yandex.ru
    Sergey S. RUMYANTSEV3, rsergs@mail.ru
    Sergey S. TETUSHKIN2,4, i@stetushkin.ru
    1 National Research Moscow State Civil Engineering University, Yaroslavskoye shosse, 26, Moscow 129337, Russian Federation
    2 Center for Complex Seismic Testing, Zheleznodorozhnaya ul., 10, pos. Roshchino, Leningrad Region 188820, Russian Federation
    3 AluminTechno, Selitskogo ul., 12, Minsk 220075, Republic of Belarus
    4 Saint Petersburg State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering, 2-ya Krasnoarmeyskaya ul., 4, St. Petersburg 190005, Russian Federation
    Abstract. The results of experimental studies to assess the seismic resistance of the spatial system of a fragment of the glass facade of an external self-supporting translucent enclosing structure with vertical (made on a ratio) and horizontal (coating) decorative elements made of aluminum alloys are analyzed. A description of the constructive solution of the rack-and-crossbar facade system is given. Dynamic tests were carried out on a two-component vibration platform. The issues that need to be addressed during tests using seismic platforms are considered. Examples from the world practice of building glass facades in earthquake-prone regions are given. The results of experimental studies of the spatial glass facade on the effect of a seismic load simulating a seismic impact are presented in the form of accelerograms and reaction spectra from the test equipment. The reaction spectra obtained from the experiment are compared with the standard spectra. The Fourier spectra of the natural oscillations of the experimental sample are constructed. The experiment showed the possibility of applying the proposed design solution of a glass-transparent system in earthquake-prone regions.
    Keywords: glass facade, seismic platform, seismic load, impact spectrum, accelerogram
  • REFERENCES
    1. Magaj A. A., Dubynin V. V. Modern glass of translucent facades of multifunctional high-rise buildings. Vestnik MGSU, 2010, no. 3, pp. 30-42. (In Russ.).
    2. Pariafsai F. Transparent buildings: the future of all glass structures. 1st International Conference on modern research Results in Science, Engineering Technology. Mashhad, Razvi Khorasan, Iran, 2016, vol. 1. doi: 10.13140/RG.2.1.2158.8724
    3. Granovskiy A. V., Rumyancev S. S., Kakusha V. A., Kudryavcev M. V. Glass as a material of load-bearing and enclosing structures. Promyshlennoe i grazhdanskoe stroitel'stvo, 2024, no. 4, pp. 28-37. (In Russ.). doi: 10.33622/0869-7019.2024.04.28-37
    4. Feldman M. et al. The new CEN / T3 19100: Design of glass structures. Glass Structures Engineering, 2023, pp.1-21. doi:10.1007/540940-023-00219-4
    5. Granovskiy A. V., Dzhamuev B. K., Voroshilov S. F., Vostrikova L. N. Studies of the effect of translucent facade structures on dynamic loads simulating seismic impacts. Promyshlennoe i grazhdanskoe stroitel'stvo, 2018, no. 12, pp. 43-48. (In Russ.).
    6. Nikolenko S. D., Sazonova S. A., Manohin V. Ya. Physical and numerical modeling of dynamic impacts on structures. Modelirovanie, optimizaciya i informacionnye tekhnologii, 2018, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 301-311. (In Russ.).
    7. Kurzanov A. M., Granovskiy A. V., Dottuev Z. I. Experimental studies of earthquake resistance of ventilated facade systems. Tekhnologii stroitel'stva, 2009, no. 1(63), pp. 48-51. (In Russ.).
    8. Akbiev R. T., Chubakov M. Zh. Methodology for conducting a comprehensive assessment of the dynamic stability and seismic safety of hinged facade systems. Prirodnye i tekhnogennye riski. Bezopasnost' sooruzhenij, 2011, no. 2, pp. 60-63. (In Russ.).
    9. Lobanov A. N. Versions of the drives in the seismic platform device. Sejsmostojkoe stroitel'stvo. Bezopasnost' sooruzhenij, 2019, no. 5, pp. 51-54. (In Russ.).
    10. Lobanov A. N., Nesterova O. P., Uzdin A. M., Shul'man S. A. Separation of impacts in the device of seismic platforms. Prirodnye i tekhnogennye riski. Bezopasnost' sooruzhenij, 2019, no. 4(41), pp. 19-23. (In Russ.).
    11. Dzhurik V. I., Serebrennikov S. P., Bryzhak E. V. et al. The methodology of forming the initial seismic signal for the purpose of zoning the seismic hazard of urban agglomerations (using the example of Irkutsk). Izvestiya Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2012, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 96-110. (In Russ.).
    12. Tubanov C. A., Predein P. A. et al. Results and prospects of seismological observations in the central part of the Baikal Rift. Rossijskij sejsmologicheskij zhurnal, 2021, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 38-51. (In Russ.).
    13. Mkrtychev O. V., Reshetov A. A. Ensuring earthquake resistance of reinforced concrete buildings. Zhelezobetonnye konstrukcii, 2024, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 57-67. (In Russ.).
  • For citation: Granovskiy A. V., Demishin S. V., Rumyantsev S. S., Tetushkin S. S. Modern Translucent Enclosing Structures for Seismic Areas. Promyshlennoe i grazhdanskoe stroitel'stvo [Industrial and Civil Engineering], 2025, no. 2, pp. 15-20. (In Russ.). doi: 10.33622/0869-7019.2025.02.15-20

BACK