Published since 1923
DOI: 10.33622/0869-7019
Russian Science Citation Index (RSCI) Web of Science
  • ECOLOGICAL SAFETY OF CONSTRUCTION AND MUNICIPAL FACILITIES
  • Design Parameters Of A Comfortable Living Environment In The Normative Documentation
  • UDC 502:69 DOI: 10.33622/0869-7019.2020.05.51-56
    Valery I. TELICHENKO1, e-mail: president@mgsu.ru
    Andrey A. BENUZH1,2, e-mail: benuzhaa@mgsu.ru
    Nikita S. RUD1, e-mail: rudbns@gmail.com
    Orlan W. YEYE1 (Republic of Kenya), e-mail: dwayneyeye@gmail.com
    1 Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University), Yaroslavskoe shosse, 26, Moscow 129337, Russian Federation
    2 Research Institute of Building Physics of the Russian Academy of Architecture and Building Sciences, Lokomotivny pr., 21, Moscow 127238, Russian Federation
    Abstract. Currently, the professional construction community information field is largely filled with the topic of creating a comfortable living environment. However, architectural and engineering design that corresponds to the concept of sustainable development is currently hindered due to the lack of a formed conceptual framework that reveals the meaning of the term "comfort", as well as a criteria list that determines the indoor environment quality in the Russian Federation regulatory and technical framework. The article offers some components of a comfortable living environment, within which the parameters of designing the internal environment of premises are highlighted. A comparative analysis of the national standards of the Russian Federation regulating the design of the internal space of residential and public buildings, with international "green" standards for a number of parameters was carried out. It is concluded that it is necessary to update the Russian regulatory and technical base taking into account the international experience of "green" standards.
    Key words: sustainable development, ecological safety, regulatory framework, "green" standards, design parameters, comfortable living environment.
  • REFERENCES
    1. Resolution adopted by the UN General Assembly. 70/1 Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. 25 September 2015. Available at: https://unctad.org/meetings/en/SessionalDocuments/ares70d1_ru.pdf (accessed 28.04.2020). (In Russian).
    2. Telichenko V. I. Construction science in the formation of the living environment. Academia. Arhitektura i stroitel'stvo, 2017, no. 1, pp. 98-100. (In Russian).
    3. Telichenko V. I., Benuzh A. A. The state and development of the technical regulation sys-tem in the field of green technologies. Academia. Arhitektura i stroitel'stvo, 2016, no. 1, pp. 118-121. (In Russian).
    4. Grifoni R., D'Onofrio R., Sargolini M. Quality of life in urban landscapes: in search of a decision support system. Cham, Springer, 2018. 398 p.
    5. Gerasimov A. I., Saltykov I. P. An estimation approach to the comfort of indoor Inhabited environment in premises of dwellings due to construction techniques. Vestnik MGSU, 2011, no. 2, pp. 406-411. (In Russian).
    6. Saltykov I. P. Creation of a comfortable environment in premises of residential buildings with account for architectural, engineering and ecological aspects. Vestnik MGSU, 2012, no. 8, pp. 189-196. (In Russian).
    7. Kim J., de Dear R. Nonlinear relationships between individual IEQ factors and overall workspace satisfaction. Building and Environment, 2012, no. 49(1), pp. 33-40. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.09.022 (accessed 28.03.2020).
    8. Ibragimov A. M., Benuzh A. A., Morozov D. N. Environmental safety assessment in the reclamation of urban Industrial zones with regression equations. Promyshlennoe i grazhdanskoe stroitel'stvo, 2019, no. 9, pp. 82-87. (In Russian).
    9. Danilov A. B. Salutogenic design: hidden opportunities for health improvement and well-being of the population. Promyshlennoe i grazhdanskoe stroitel'stvo, 2019, no. 7, pp. 10-17. (In Russian).
    10. Generalov V. P., Generalova E. M. Identification of distinctive features of "living comfort" and "comfortable living environment". Vestnik SGASU. Gradostroitel'stvo i arhitektura, 2016, no. 2(23), pp. 85-90. (In Russian).
    11. Volkova N. G., Ceshkovskaya E. Yu. Ecological aspects of the microclimate in residential and public buildings. Biosfernaya sovmestimost': chelovek, region, tekhnologii, 2019, no. 4, pp. 63-73. (In Russian).
    12. Danilov A. B., Benuzh A. A. Evolution of insolation requirements for residential real estate in Moscow. Nedvizhimost': ekonomika, upravlenie, 2019, no. 2, pp. 42-45. (In Russian).
  • For citation: Telichenko V. I., Benuzh A. A., Rud N. S., Yeye O. W. Design Parameters of a Comfortable Living Environment in the Normative Documentation. Promyshlennoe i grazhdanskoe stroitel'stvo [Industrial and Civil Engineering], 2020, no. 5, pp. 51-56. (In Russian). DOI: 10.33622/0869-7019.2020.05.51-56.


BACK