Published since 1923
DOI: 10.33622/0869-7019
Russian Science Citation Index (RSCI) Web of Science
  • To Assessment of Reliability of Experimental Test Methods of Stone Structures for Warping
  • UDC 693.1/.2:691:620.1
    Arkady V. GRANOVSKY, e-mail:
    Nataliya Yu. SAYFULINA, e-mail:
    JSC Research Center of Construction, Research Institute of Building Constructions (TSNIISK) named after V. A. Koucherenko, 2-ya Institutskaya ul., 6, Moscow 109428, Russian Federation
    Azamat A. GASIEV, e-mail:
    FGBU "TSNIIP Minstroya Rossii", prosp. Vernadskogo, 29, Moscow 119331, Russian Federation
    Abstract. A comparative analysis of assessment of reliability of the compression test results of ceramic whole brick and ceramic large-format stone with voidness over 40% has been made in accordance with normative documents. On the basis of the experiment results, the dependence of the compressive strength of ceramic stone on the direction of application of the load relative to its faces is shown. The calculated characteristics of the compressive strength of large-format ceramic stone at different directions of application of the load to the side and end faces have been obtained. On the concrete examples of tests of wall fragments made of ceramic hollow bricks and stones for the effect of horizontal load with the use of domestic and foreign testing methods it is shown that the standard methodology of tests for warping used for walls made of ceramic whole brick does not correspond to real one due to the stressed state of masonry under the impact of horizontal seismic force during the earthquake. When designing buildings constructed in seismic regions, on the basis of experimental studies, it is necessary to determine the permissible for seismic regions grades of large-format stone for compression depending on the direction of load application to it.
    Key words: ceramic large-format stone with voidness over 40%, warping, compression test methodology, experiment, seismic load.
    1. Onishchik L. I. Prochnost' i ustoychivost' kamennykh konstruktsiy. Ch. 1. Rabota elementov kamennoy konstruktsiy [The strength and stability of stone structures. Part 1. The elements of masonry structures]. Moscow, 1937. 291 p. (In Russian).
    2. Ulybin A. V., Zubkov S. V. Methods of control of strength of ceramic bricks in the inspection of buildings and structures. Inzhenerno-stroitel'nyy zhurnal, 2012, no. 3, pp. 29-34. (In Russian).
    3. Guchkin I. S., Zhernosek N. M. Determination of the strength (grade) of ceramic bricks in the structures by nondestructive methods. Izvestiya vuzov. Stroitel'stvo, 2006, no. 1, pp. 103-104. (In Russian).
    4. Derkach V. N., Zhernosek N. M. Methods for assessing the strength of masonry in domestic and foreign practice inspection of buildings and structures. Vestnik Belorussko-Rossiyskogo universiteta, 2010, no. 3(28), pp. 135-143. (In Russian).
    5. Mungin A. A. New approaches to standard tests, axial compression of samples of brittle materials. Izvestiya PGUPS, 2013, no. 2, pp. 64-67. (In Russian).
    6. Pangaev V .V. On the influence of friction during the tests brick compression. Izvestiya vuzov. Stroitel'stvo, 2010, no. 10, pp. 99-106. (In Russian).
    7. Fabrichnaya K. A. Prochnost' kamennoy kladki iz pustotelykh keramicheskikh kamney pri tsentral'nom szhatii [Durability of a stone laying from hollow ceramic stones at the central compression]. Dis. kand. tekhn. nauk. Kazan, 2013. 130 p. (In Russian).
    8. Granovskiy A. V., Sayfulina N. Yu., Ivanova G. M., Efimenko M. N. Seismic resistance of walls made of large-size ceramic porous (polished) multicavity stones with the use of adhesive solution. Promyshlennoe i grazhdanskoe stroitel'stvo, 2013, no. 6, pp. 67-70. (In Russian).
    9. Tekhnicheskiy otchet "Tekhnicheskaya podgotovka i soprovozhdenie issledovaniy razlichnykh stroitel'nykh prisposobleniy dlya kladki iz krupnoformatnykh kamney "POROMAX" [The technical report "Technical training and support research in a variety of construction tools for the masonry of large stones "POROMAX"]. Krasnodar, Stroydiagnostika, 2014. 160 p. (In Russian).
    10. Bubis A. A. Verification of the procedure for calculating fragments of walls for seismic load. Seysmostoykoe stroitel'stvo. Bezopasnost' sooruzheniy, 2015, no. 6, pp. 21-27. (In Russian).
    11. Bubis A. A. Method of calculation of multilayer stone-monolithic walls taking into account the work of all layers of the structure, including the seismic load. Seysmostoykoe stroitel'stvo. Bezopasnost' sooruzheniy, 2017, no. 1, pp. 47-54. (In Russian).
    12. Graubner C.-A., Kranzler T. ESECMaSE - Deliverable D4.4 - Verification of the design model with test results from WP 6, 7 and 8. Darmstadt, July 2007.
    13. Polyakov S. V. Seysmostoykie konstruktsii zdaniy [Earthquake resistant structures of buildings]. Moscow, Vysshaya shkola Publ., 1983. 306 p. (In Russian).
  • For citation: Granovsky A. V., Sayfulina N. Yu., Gasiev A. A. To Assessment of Reliability of Experimental Test Methods of Stone Structures for Warping. Promyshlennoe i grazhdanskoe stroitel'stvo [Industrial and Civil Engineering], 2018, no. 3, pp. 31-35. (In Russian).